Notes on AI adoption in legal practice, digital forensics, and legal technology — written from hands-on work with law firms and the courtroom.
From semantic legal research to AI-drafted Statements of Claim: a technical tour of how AI is reshaping the modern Australian law firm — data ingestion, security architecture, and the multi-agent drafting pipeline.
Read More →On 16 April 2026, the Federal Court of Australia signed into effect its first comprehensive framework governing generative AI in court proceedings — binding on lawyers and self-represented litigants alike.
Read More →When a self-represented litigant uploads privileged case-preparation material to a public AI platform, does Australian law treat that as a waiver of privilege? A comparative look at ss 120/122 of the Evidence Act against recent UK and US authority.
Read More →Strip away the jargon and the architecture of a modern AI agent looks exactly like a brief to counsel — client instructions, an instructing solicitor, and a barrister who has never seen your file before today.
Read More →The FCFCOA has warned that entering draft documents into an AI program risks waiving privilege. A close look at how Claude’s context window, data retention, and training opt-outs actually work — and how that compares to a decade of Outlook mailboxes sitting in the cloud.
Read More →